Violent White Rightist Americans Shooting Americans With Their Guns
(too old to reply)
Mr. B1ack
2017-07-17 00:30:39 UTC
Raw Message
Cousins charged in homicides of four Pennsylvania men

On a Friday night a week ago, three men got out of a pickup
truck on a sprawling piece of rural Pennsylvania real estate.

Thomas Meo and Mark Sturgis were ready to buy some pot. The
other man, Cosmo Dinardo, had a dark, grisly secret, police
say. Not far from the spot, the body of another man, killed
earlier that day, was in a metal container, according to court
documents. Not far away, another body was in a grave. Dinardo
would later tell police he had a Smith and Wesson .357
revolver. "When they (Meo and Sturgis) turned their backs on
me, I shot Tom in the back," Dinardo allegedly told detectives
questioning him, according to a criminal complaint. On Friday,
Dinardo, 20, and his cousin, Sean Kratz, also 20, were charged
with homicide, conspiracy and abuse of a corpse as well as with
robbery and a weapons charge. A judge entered not-guilty pleas
on their behalf and they are being held without bail. Dinardo
is also accused in the fatal shootings of Jimi Patrick and Dean
Finocchiaro. The four young victims, who went missing last
week, were lured to the remote property with promises of buying
marijuana, but they were shot and killed, and buried in graves
dug by a backhoe, according to the Bucks County, Pennsylvania,
district attorney. The victims were discovered buried on the
large property owned by Dinardo's parents in Solebury Township,
according to a statement from the district attorney's office.
Investigators found the bodies of Finocchiaro, Meo and Sturgis
in a 12œ-foot-deep grave Wednesday, according to the complaint.
Patrick's body was found in a separate grave late Thursday.
Dinardo confession Sean Kratz (left) and Cosmo Dinardo face
multiple homicide charges. Sean Kratz (left) and Cosmo Dinardo
face multiple homicide charges. Dinardo, who was arrested for
theft on Wednesday, confessed to his involvement in the
killings the next day, his attorney Paul Lang said. In exchange
for that confession, prosecutors agreed not to seek the death
penalty against him. Bucks County District Attorney Matthew
Weintraub said that if he hadn't made the deal, "we'd still be
looking" for Jimi Patrick's body, which was buried about half
of a mile away from the other grave. "I can't predict the
future, but that is what I believe," Weintraub said. "I don't
know what convinced him (to confess). I'd like to think that he
wanted to help us get these boys home." The families of the
victims agreed to take the death penalty off the table in
exchange for his confession, according to Bucks County
Assistant District Attorney Gregg Shore. Dinardo and Kratz are
cousins, the criminal complaint states. Meo and Sturgis were
friends, but the four victims were only connected insofar as
they agreed to meet Dinardo to buy marijuana, according to the
affidavit. Weintraub said he believed Dinardo and Kratz are the
only ones involved in the killings, but said more information
could change that position. All shot and killed
From left: Jimi Patrick, Thomas Meo, Dean Finocchiaro, and Mark
Sturgis. From left: Jimi Patrick, Thomas Meo, Dean Finocchiaro,
and Mark Sturgis. In his confession, Dinardo detailed a series
of shocking killings with no clear motive. Kratz spoke to
investigators on Thursday night. On July 5, Dinardo agreed to
sell Patrick four pounds of marijuana for $8,000, and Dinardo
drove and picked Patrick up and brought him back to the
farmland property, according to the affidavit. When they
arrived, Patrick said he only had $800, and Dinardo agreed to
sell him a shotgun for that amount. Dinardo then took him to a
remote part of the property, gave him a shotgun, and then shot
and killed him with a 22 caliber rifle, according to the
affidavit. Dinardo allegedly used a backhoe to dig a
6-foot-deep hole and bury him, the affidavit states.

On July 7, Dinardo agreed to sell a quarter-pound of marijuana
to Finocchiaro, the affidavit states. Dinardo picked up Kratz,
his cousin, and the two drove to Finocchiaro's house and
planned to rob him, the affidavit states. The three of them
drove back to Dinardo's large property. There, Kratz shot
Finocchiaro in the head with a handgun that belonged to
Dinardo's mother, Dinardo said, according to the criminal
complaint. However, Kratz told police that Dinardo was the one
who shot Finocchiaro. They then placed him in a metal tank that
Dinardo referred to as the pig roaster, according to the
criminal complaint. Afterward, Dinardo agreed to sell marijuana
to Thomas Meo that same night, and he picked up Meo and his
friend Mark Sturgis and drove them back to his property, the
affidavit states. Dinardo told police that when they exited the
vehicle he shot Meo in the back, who fell to the ground
screaming. Sturgis started to run away, and Dinardo shot
Sturgis, killing him, the affidavit states. Dinardo then drove
the backhoe over Meo and "basically crushes him," Kratz told
police, according to the complaint. Dinardo allegedly used the
backhoe to lift their bodies up and put them in the metal tank
with Finocchiaro's body, according to the complaint. Dinardo
allegedly poured gasoline into the tank and lit it, the
complaint says. "There was an attempt to burn the bodies, to
deface them, to obliterate them, but I don't believe that that
was successful," Weintraub said. Dinardo and Kratz returned to
the property the next afternoon and used the backhoe to dig a
hole and bury Finocchiaro, Meo and Sturgis, the complaint
2017-07-17 12:22:11 UTC
Raw Message
Since the USA government did 9/11, is disarming the citizens really a
good idea?

CIA insider tells 9/11 truth. Time to re-examine your World-view,

The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse
of steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes,
is the SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small
fires and superficial debris damage could not account for this
collapse, which had all the earmarks of controlled demolition by
explosives. Videos clearly show this. Such demolitions take many days
or weeks to set up - not the few hours between the plane "attacks" and
the collapse. The explosives therefore had to be put in place
BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of previously placed
explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like the badly
damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have
remained standing.

Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological
denial still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it
obviously was, and they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and
fabrications, elaborate lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to
defend their indefensible position. The REAL terrorists are desperate
to cover up their mass-murderous crime of the century - the permitting
if not perpetration of, and subsequent political and economic
exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.

Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's
most sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible
morning? I don't think so!

There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable
than the explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing
down of NORAD. Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on
the roofs of nearby buildings. These were too far away to be from
jumpers from the towers. If the towers simply collapsed from damage
and fire alone, what blew these bodies to smithereens and sent the
fragments flying for considerable distances? The plane impacts did not
have the explosive brisance (shattering force) necessary to do this -
only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny bits and throw them such

So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than
their being the result of high explosives being detonated in the

The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the
falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade
Center building collapses:


On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World Trade
Center (WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent
people. Videos of the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for
days. About 5 hours after the towers fell, WTC building 7 also
collapsed suddenly, completely, and straight down at near free-fall
speed. This steel-framed building was not touched by the planes that
struck the towers, and had sustained relatively minor debris damage
and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily damaged remained

In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan
Reynolds, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert
Gates stated, "The American people know what they saw with their own
eyes on September11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government
conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale."

We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's
tale that's "beyond the pale!"

Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics,
and the emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have
stymied objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of
authoritarian assertions?

The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told
us that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now
referred to as a "pancake collapse". According to the government
claims, the plane crashes and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet
fuel is NOT exotic) fires heated the UL-certified structural steel to
the point where it was significantly weakened, which is very difficult
to believe, never mind repeat in an experiment. Even with massive
fires that incinerate everything else, the steel frames of such
buildings generally remain standing.

According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical
evidence was quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly
caused part of the tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the
tower, which, we've been repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain
reaction of the lower floors sequentially, one at a time, yielding to
the weight falling from above.

There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the
observed facts

* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical
steel core columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the

* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to

This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from
the air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the
tower. Those undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered
resistance thousands of times greater than that of air. Those lower
stories, and the central steel core columns, had successfully
supported the mass of the tower for 30 years despite hurricane-force
winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.

Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the
way of the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction
as air would? Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing
the fall of the upper floors less than would, say, a parachute?

What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers
could not have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower
stories, as rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is
shown to be physically impossible!



In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the
observed duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more
of the following zany-sounding conditions must have been met

* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero
resistance to the collapse.
* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any
expenditure of energy.
* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by

None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible,
conditions can be accounted for by the official government theory of
9/11, nor by any of the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to
prop up this official myth of 9/11.

The Bottom Line

It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that the
WTC collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the
plane impacts.

The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that
the towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but
rather they came down because something else was causing them to

So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates'
other premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is
left to you to decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly
incorrect presumptions, is also flawed.

The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, also
collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day.


No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever
collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel

Understanding the full truth of 9/11 seems to require two separate

The first, awakening to the fraudulence of the "official 9/11 story,"
is a pretty simple brain function and only requires a little study,
logic or curiosity. We can help a lot with that part here and it's a
major purpose of this site.

The second step, however, consciously confronting the implications of
that knowledge--and what it says about our media, politics and
economic system today--is by far the harder awakening and requires an
enormous exercise of nerve and heart. (As the Chinese say, "You cannot
wake up a man who is pretending to sleep.") In other words, this part
of the journey depends more on character than on maps and evidence so
we can't help you much here, except to point out inspiring heroes and
heroines who have courageously faced that truth, spoken out, and

www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org

2017-07-17 15:00:46 UTC
Raw Message
"Mr. B1ack" wrote in message news:***@

You're not fooling anyone, Mr. Wonderful...
From: "Mr. B1ack" <***@gop.net>
Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism
Subject: Violent White Rightist Americans Shooting Americans With Their Guns
Followup-To: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.arts.tv,rec.crafts.metalworking
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: blac
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <***@>
NNTP-Posting-Host: UV2k5pE7oyAQ6qJtKueD0Q.user.gioia.aioe.org
X-Complaints-To: ***@aioe.org
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Bytes: 6333
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com misc.survivalism:1821643
talk.politics.guns:3886976 uk.politics.misc:3479388