On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:27:27 +0200, abelard <***@abelard.org>
>On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 19:00:38 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
>>On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 19:04:14 +0200, abelard <***@abelard.org>
>>>On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 17:35:33 +0100, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
>>>>On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 14:24:44 +0200, abelard <***@abelard.org>
>>>>>On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 08:11:59 -0400, "BurfordTJustice"
>>>>>>LOL!! are you a nanus bod??????
>>>>>>"7" <***@enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>: US media full of fake news whipping up fake trade war
>>>>>>: In order for US companies to take advantage of turmoil around trade wars,
>>>>>>: all the US media cumpanies like Blooomberg are on full overdrive selling
>>>>>>: fake news and whipping up a fake trade war.
>>>>>>: The simple fact in all this is that USA is just some 250 million
>>>>>>: peoples and amount to 3% of the population.
>>>>>>: So if you are making watches, clothes, smartphones, tablets,
>>>>>>: computers, cars, steel, concrete, and all other industrial
>>>>>>: and commercial goods, you are still servicing just 3% of the market.
>>>>>glory be you are dumb...
>>>>>the usa economy is around 20+% of world gdp....
>>>>>not selling to the usa will mean china can't get the same prices...
>>>>> and can't employ so many of their serf labourers...
>>>>>that will undermine their dear leader's acceptability...
>>>>>the average chinese is about 1/4r the income of an american...
>>>>> china is far more crowded than the usa...
>>>>The population density isn't high for either. Even the UK only comes
>>>>52nd in the world.
>>Not at all,
>yes at all
>> neither are as crowded as the UK.
>>You haven't proven that
>>crowding is an issue at all. Why did you bring it up?
>i wasn't trying to prove anything...just stating
> that china is weak relative to the usa
>>>the average american has more than 4 times the land of the
>>> average chinese...
>>You haven't proven that at all. You can't just divide total land mass by
>>population and come to that conclusion. Average people live on quite
>>small plots of land.
>or in the gutters of delhi
>>>as i recall it is also better quality
>>>china has a major land contamination problem...
>>>it has air quality problems..
>>>it has an aging problem...
>>All countries have problems. None of these prove a crowding problem.
>>>United States agricultural land: 44.5%
>>>arable land 16.8%; permanent crops 0.3%; permanent pasture 27.4%
>>>other: 22.2% (2011 est.)
>>>China agricultural land: 54.7%
>>>arable land 11.3%; permanent crops 1.6%; permanent pasture 41.8%
>>>other: 23% (2011 est.)
>>>but it is good to see you trying to use numbers...
>>It would be nice to see you using some that make sense of your
>>statements. Are the Chinese starving. I don't think so. I see no other
>>relevance of the above statistics. If there is one then please explain
>>it to me.
>a very large proportion remain very poor
>>>>I can't see any obvious trend between population density and wealth
>>>>which I find surprising.
>>>meanwhile the average chinese have 1/4 the wealth of the americans
>>What does that mean? The cost of living in the US is very much higher.
>>Hundreds of percent in some cases. Your 1/4 wealth stat doesn't seem to
>>offer any kind of fair comparison.
>then go live in china
>>What is wealth anyway?
>>Owning a wooden shack on a piece of worthless dirt vs owning a brick
>>build on European soil.
>>How do you compare the two?
>every person value differently...but it is europe and the
> usa that see people wanting to get in...
>while other countries see people trying to get out
>that is real people making real choices..not you pseudo intellectual
> world of relative theories
>do you suppose that can be reduced to just a couple of numbers?
>as i stated above...go live in china...you won't...
>as with so many you believe in theory....not reality
>but you still don't choose to live in china
I don't choose to live in the USA either. I quite like France but I
don't choose to live there. Don't see the relevance of this argument.
Breathes there the man, with soul so dead,
Who never to himself hath said,
This is my own, my native land!
Whose heart hath ne'er within him burn'd,
As home his footsteps he hath turn'd,
From wandering on a foreign strand!
If such there breathe, go, mark him well;
For him no Minstrel raptures swell;
High though his titles, proud his name,
Boundless his wealth as wish can claim;
Despite those titles, power, and pelf,
The wretch, concentred all in self,
Living, shall forfeit fair renown,
And, doubly dying, shall go down
To the vile dust, from whence he sprung,
Unwept, unhonour'd, and unsung.
It has little to do with money or monetary wealth that I live in the UK.
It has far more to do with another kind of wealth.
Has it ever occurred to you that many Chinese may feel the same.
You have totally failed to show any proof that there is a population
density issue in China or provide vaguely comparable stats of wealth
taking into account the cost of living. Do the Chinese themselves feel
they live in poverty any more than Americans overall. I wonder. Studies
show that people think having 25% more would make them wealthy and feel
economically 'safe' irrespective of income. Even though I know this, I
still feel this and absurdly as your wealth increases the bar rises.
Your assertion that the US is the big daddy doesn't add up. Europe,
China and the US have roughly the same share of global GDP. Factoring in
cost of living, aspiration of the population, and a shit load of other
factors is almost impossible but China doesn't look to me anywhere near
as weak as you make out.
Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme,
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook,
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag,
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.
NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist
Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.
Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky