Discussion:
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
Add Reply
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 00:24:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something non
kikemasons are not allowed to know?

cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL fortran
seems good enough, has functions with local variables and return
values... good enough...

problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew his
programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and two
different results... errr... derrr....

oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 00:46:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something non
kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL fortran
seems good enough, has functions with local variables and return
values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew his
programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and two
different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
and, I do not think a good programmer should work for shite like that!

measuring your stuff to targets shites like that set!

only targets shites like that should get is an invisible dot between the
eyes... slightly before the bullet hits....
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 00:57:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something non
kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL fortran
seems good enough, has functions with local variables and return
values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew his
programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and two
different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function with
one return value and multiple parameters

you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a value
by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is dependent on a
value part way through calculation that calculates first value...

however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of interdependent
value calculations code...

problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 01:10:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something
non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL
fortran seems good enough, has functions with local variables and
return values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew
his programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and two
different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function with
one return value and multiple parameters
you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a value
by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is dependent on a
value part way through calculation that calculates first value...
however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of
interdependent value calculations code...
problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
talking of "tricksy" that was a good recent remake of an old b movie,
"The Crazies" which the remake is available on youtube...

crashed bomber containing experimental bio-weapon crashes near town...
with classic results!

the scene at the end with the big rig riding the a-bomb wave out of town
eh! good film!
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 01:43:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something
non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL
fortran seems good enough, has functions with local variables and
return values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew
his programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and two
different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function with
one return value and multiple parameters
you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a value
by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is dependent on a
value part way through calculation that calculates first value...
however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of
interdependent value calculations code...
problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
so fortran is much more like math, math is all one value on left of
equation = formula
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 01:48:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something
non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL
fortran seems good enough, has functions with local variables and
return values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew
his programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and
two different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function with
one return value and multiple parameters
you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a
value by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is
dependent on a value part way through calculation that calculates first
value...
however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of
interdependent value calculations code...
problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
so fortran is much more like math, math is all one value on left of
equation = formula
I mean you may have dx/dy = formula but dx/dy is still one value

you may rearrange the formula to wind up with dx/1 or 1/dy but still one
value...
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 01:59:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something
non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL
fortran seems good enough, has functions with local variables and
return values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew
his programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and
two different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function
with one return value and multiple parameters
you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a
value by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is
dependent on a value part way through calculation that calculates
first value...
however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of
interdependent value calculations code...
problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
so fortran is much more like math, math is all one value on left of
equation = formula
I mean you may have dx/dy = formula but dx/dy is still one value
you may rearrange the formula to wind up with dx/1 or 1/dy but still one
value...
ok math goes to sequences on the left = formula(sequence-item)

just a for loop calling a function....
CheeseySock
2020-05-21 02:05:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
Post by CheeseySock
is that neil ferguson a high-rimming freemason? or is that something
non kikemasons are not allowed to know?
cunt colonel sanders on alex jones radio was blaming fortran LOL
fortran seems good enough, has functions with local variables and
return values... good enough...
problem is cunts that are actively evil little cunts! surely he knew
his programming was shite... stick same set of numbers in twice and
two different results... errr... derrr....
oh! it was genetic programming eh! kiek bastard!
I guess it is both good and bad that fortran only has the function
with one return value and multiple parameters
you cannot do one function that returns two values (i.e. passing a
value by modifiable address like in C) even if second value is
dependent on a value part way through calculation that calculates
first value...
however each function should be clear in the process it involves to
return one value even if that involves some duplication of
interdependent value calculations code...
problem comes if you try to get tricksy... not keep it simple...
so fortran is much more like math, math is all one value on left of
equation = formula
I mean you may have dx/dy = formula but dx/dy is still one value
you may rearrange the formula to wind up with dx/1 or 1/dy but still
one value...
that is to say no way to calculate dx and dy in one pass in math... can
do in C
Post by CheeseySock
ok math goes to sequences on the left = formula(sequence-item)
just a for loop calling a function....
Loading...