Discussion:
VAT of AMAZON EU sales of UK goods
(too old to reply)
jew watch
2020-01-11 20:39:18 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:49:53 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
The bigger the compant easier they deal with governments. It is the
sole trader pays the bill, Now Tesco cashiers started asking you
occcasinally if you want a receipt or not with your purchase !!!!!
One wonders who pockets the cash .
Are you seriously suggesting that Tesco pockets your cash, without
accounting for it, unless you ask for a printed copy of your receipt?
Seriously?
Are you sherioushly shuggeshting that a company founded by a jew is
unlikely to do such a thing? Sheriouhsly?
Anyone remember 'Dame' Shirley Porter (née Cohen), Tesco heiress?
"In May 1996, after legal investigation work, the District Auditor
finally concluded that the 'Building Stable Communities' policy had
been illegal, and ordered Porter and five others to pay the cost of
the illegal policy, which were calculated as £31.6 million. This
judgement was upheld by the High Court in 1997 with liability reduced
solely to Porter and her Deputy Leader, David Weeks. After the
judgement, the scandal and its effects were discussed in Parliament on
14 May 1996. In 1998, BBC2 screened a documentary, Looking for
Shirley, which profiled Westminster City Council's efforts to recover
the surcharge and Porter's efforts to move her estimated £70m assets
into offshore accounts and overseas investments.
The Court of Appeal overturned the judgement in 1999, but the House of
Lords reinstated it in 2001 (see Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67,
[2002] 2 AC 357). Including interest, the surcharge now stood at £43.3
million. In Israel, Porter transferred substantial parts of her great
wealth to other members of her family and into secret trusts in an
effort to avoid the charge, and subsequently claimed assets of only
£300,000."
These subpeople simply can't HELP it...it's GENETIC!
Mangina, there is nothing genetic about it!
Needledick, it is just so fucking common that it GOT, to be genetic.
There was nothing genetic about Dr. David Duke's fraud!
There WAS no fraud, mong.
Peeler
2020-01-11 21:37:01 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:39:18 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by jew watch
Mangina, there is nothing genetic about it!
Needledick, it is just so fucking common that it GOT, to be genetic.
Your idiocy, degeneration and perversion indeed MUST be genetic, dreckserb
Razovic!
Post by jew watch
There was nothing genetic about Dr. David Duke's fraud!
There WAS no fraud, mong.
Tell that Duke's victims, retard!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2020-01-12 17:39:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by jew watch
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:49:53 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Are you seriously suggesting that Tesco pockets your cash, without
accounting for it, unless you ask for a printed copy of your receipt?
Seriously?
Are you sherioushly shuggeshting that a company founded by a jew is
unlikely to do such a thing? Sheriouhsly?
Anyone remember 'Dame' Shirley Porter (née Cohen), Tesco heiress?
"In May 1996, after legal investigation work, the District Auditor
finally concluded that the 'Building Stable Communities' policy had
been illegal, and ordered Porter and five others to pay the cost of
the illegal policy, which were calculated as £31.6 million. This
judgement was upheld by the High Court in 1997 with liability reduced
solely to Porter and her Deputy Leader, David Weeks. After the
judgement, the scandal and its effects were discussed in Parliament on
14 May 1996. In 1998, BBC2 screened a documentary, Looking for
Shirley, which profiled Westminster City Council's efforts to recover
the surcharge and Porter's efforts to move her estimated £70m assets
into offshore accounts and overseas investments.
The Court of Appeal overturned the judgement in 1999, but the House of
Lords reinstated it in 2001 (see Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67,
[2002] 2 AC 357). Including interest, the surcharge now stood at £43.3
million. In Israel, Porter transferred substantial parts of her great
wealth to other members of her family and into secret trusts in an
effort to avoid the charge, and subsequently claimed assets of only
£300,000."
These subpeople simply can't HELP it...it's GENETIC!
Mangina, there is nothing genetic about it!
Needledick, it is just so fucking common that it GOT, to be genetic.
Wrong.
Post by jew watch
There was nothing genetic about Dr. David Duke's fraud!
There WAS no fraud, mong.
Nithing, there was fraud.

http://groups.google.com/d/msg/soc.culture.israel/xDzDwozPLdo/uNfQER0kBAAJ



David Duke, ex-con
******************
"Duke pleaded guilty to what prosecutors described as a six-year
scheme to dupe thousands of his followers by asking for donations.
Through postal mail, Duke later appealed to his supporters that
he was about to lose his house and his life savings. Prosecutors
claimed that Duke raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in this
campaign. Prosecutors also claimed he sold his home at a hefty
profit, had multiple investment accounts, and spent much of his
money gambling at casinos.[138][139][140]"

Loading...