Discussion:
Another jew declared bankrupt; creditors are screwed
Add Reply
Grikkbassturd®™
2019-11-26 19:08:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711

Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Peeler
2019-11-26 20:03:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 11:08:42 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Negroid dicks for your arse you can still afford, dumb gay anal Razovic?
--
Dumb gay anal Razovic about herself:
"And you just wish someone, anyone, anything would cornhole you!"
Keema's Nan
2019-11-26 20:14:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Dear oh dear. She looks like an advert for failed cosmetic surgery.
Peeler
2019-11-26 20:44:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:14:21 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Dear oh dear. She looks like an advert for failed cosmetic surgery.
OTOH, YOU sound like a typical senile sucker of troll cock!
Keema's Nan
2019-11-26 20:58:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peeler
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:14:21 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Dear oh dear. She looks like an advert for failed cosmetic surgery.
OTOH, YOU sound like a typical senile sucker of troll cock!
Yes, but you have denied me the chance to suck yours.

Why is this? Do you believe you are not a troll? Or are you ashamed of your
cock?
Peeler
2019-11-26 21:09:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:58:34 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Peeler
OTOH, YOU sound like a typical senile sucker of troll cock!
Yes, but you have denied me the chance to suck yours.
Why is this? Do you believe you are not a troll? Or are you ashamed of your
cock?
Trying to have one of your retarded "conversations", you retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot? You failed!
Keema's Nan
2019-11-26 21:56:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peeler
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:58:34 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Peeler
OTOH, YOU sound like a typical senile sucker of troll cock!
Yes, but you have denied me the chance to suck yours.
Why is this? Do you believe you are not a troll? Or are you ashamed of your
cock?
Trying to have one of your retarded "conversations", you retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot? You failed!
I know. I have always failed. That is why I am on usenet.

Everyone is a failure here.
Peeler
2019-11-26 22:11:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:56:51 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Peeler
Trying to have one of your retarded "conversations", you retarded,
troll-feeding, senile idiot? You failed!
I know. I have always failed. That is why I am on usenet.
Everyone is a failure here.
But only the dumbest among you failures suck troll cock, senile idiot!
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-26 20:53:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 20:14:21 +0000, Keema's Nan
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Dear oh dear. She looks like an advert for failed cosmetic surgery.
Trying to keep up with the Kardashians...and failing.
Peeler
2019-11-26 21:11:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 12:53:55 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Keema's Nan
Dear oh dear. She looks like an advert for failed cosmetic surgery.
Trying to keep up with the Kardashians...and failing.
NOBODY could ever fail as much as you do, you total failure of a wannabe
human!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
Vidcapper
2019-11-27 06:58:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Peeler
2019-11-27 08:43:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Because the psychopath checks ANY celebrities for any -however distant-
Jewish relatives! LOL
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-27 17:09:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
Peeler
2019-11-27 17:34:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:09:39 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
It doesn't. Your psychopathic "mind" does!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Vidcapper
2019-11-28 06:59:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Farmer Giles
2019-11-28 08:31:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
GB
2019-11-28 11:40:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
Farmer Giles
2019-11-28 12:05:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
GB
2019-11-28 12:19:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.

As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
Farmer Giles
2019-11-28 13:07:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
He cared enough to question the op twice about it. We could throw the
question back and ask why he cares that someone is said to be Jewish?
And how does he, or you for that matter, know what people think?

Like you, he 'polices' these ngs and homes in every time the word 'Jew'
gets mentioned.

Katie Price is Jewish, and she's just been declared bankrupt, simple as
that.
GB
2019-11-28 14:16:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
He cared enough to question the op twice about it. We could throw the
question back and ask why he cares that someone is said to be Jewish?
And how does he, or you for that matter, know what people think?
How do you know what Paul thinks? Perhaps he just cares about
challenging racism? From his past posting, it's pretty clear that
challenging racism is indeed one of the things he cares about.
Post by Farmer Giles
Like you, he 'polices' these ngs and homes in every time the word 'Jew'
gets mentioned.
Do I police this NG? And you, what's your role?
Post by Farmer Giles
Katie Price is Jewish, and she's just been declared bankrupt, simple as
that.
To be precise, she has one Jewish grandparent and three non-Jewish ones,
but I wouldn't expect a wee bit of inaccuracy to get in the way of the
point you're trying to make. And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt. To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.

Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year. Perhaps you could
explain?
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 14:35:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:16:44 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
He cared enough to question the op twice about it. We could throw the
question back and ask why he cares that someone is said to be Jewish?
And how does he, or you for that matter, know what people think?
How do you know what Paul thinks? Perhaps he just cares about
challenging racism? From his past posting, it's pretty clear that
challenging racism is indeed one of the things he cares about.
Identifying jews such as Katie Price and you is not 'racism'.
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Like you, he 'polices' these ngs and homes in every time the word 'Jew'
gets mentioned.
Do I police this NG? And you, what's your role?
WE arks the questions, jewboi.
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Katie Price is Jewish, and she's just been declared bankrupt, simple as
that.
To be precise, she has one Jewish grandparent and three non-Jewish ones,
but I wouldn't expect a wee bit of inaccuracy to get in the way of the
point you're trying to make. And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt. To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.
To be precise, your jew race's bizarre matrilineal rules make her 100%
jew because of her jew maternal grandmother. And her 'train wreck' of
a life is all of her own making.
Post by GB
Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year. Perhaps you could
explain?
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
JNugent
2019-11-28 14:39:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:16:44 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
He cared enough to question the op twice about it. We could throw the
question back and ask why he cares that someone is said to be Jewish?
And how does he, or you for that matter, know what people think?
How do you know what Paul thinks? Perhaps he just cares about
challenging racism? From his past posting, it's pretty clear that
challenging racism is indeed one of the things he cares about.
Identifying jews such as Katie Price and you is not 'racism'.
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Like you, he 'polices' these ngs and homes in every time the word 'Jew'
gets mentioned.
Do I police this NG? And you, what's your role?
WE arks the questions, jewboi.
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Katie Price is Jewish, and she's just been declared bankrupt, simple as
that.
To be precise, she has one Jewish grandparent and three non-Jewish ones,
but I wouldn't expect a wee bit of inaccuracy to get in the way of the
point you're trying to make. And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt. To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.
To be precise, your jew race's bizarre matrilineal rules make her 100%
jew because of her jew maternal grandmother. And her 'train wreck' of
a life is all of her own making.
Post by GB
Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year. Perhaps you could
explain?
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
GB
2019-11-28 17:08:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Identifying jews such as Katie Price and you is not 'racism'.
It's hardly difficult in my case, Sherlock.
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt.  To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.
To be precise, your jew race's bizarre matrilineal rules make her 100%
jew because of her jew maternal grandmother.  And her 'train wreck' of
a life is all of her own making.
Agreed. So is yours, Andrzej. I feel sorry for her. Same as I feel sorry
for you.
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year.  Perhaps you could
explain?
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
Are we? You no doubt have a source for that, but funnily enough I'm not
going to hold my breath.

By the way, "Made it up" doesn't count as a source.
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
Indeed. These days, it is thought of more charitably as allowing people
to recover from severe debt and lead a worthwhile life.
Grrikbastard®™
2019-11-28 17:33:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:08:18 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Identifying jews such as Katie Price and you is not 'racism'.
It's hardly difficult in my case, Sherlock.
I'm sure your contorted rodent-like jew face stands out like a sore
thumb, Shylock.
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt.  To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.
To be precise, your jew race's bizarre matrilineal rules make her 100%
jew because of her jew maternal grandmother.  And her 'train wreck' of
a life is all of her own making.
Agreed. So is yours, Andrzej. I feel sorry for her. Same as I feel sorry
for you.
I don't feel sorry for her at all. Any more than I feel sorry for a
sleazy little raghead like you.
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year.  Perhaps you could
explain?
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
Are we? You no doubt have a source for that, but funnily enough I'm not
going to hold my breath.
Yes, do hold your breath...for 10 minutes or so.
Post by GB
By the way, "Made it up" doesn't count as a source.
By the way, all this is common knowledge, gleaned from centuries of
observing jew behaviour.
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
Indeed. These days, it is thought of more charitably as allowing people
to recover from severe debt and lead a worthwhile life.
What about the creditors who get screwed by these fake jew
bankruptcies? How are they to recover?
GB
2019-11-28 18:25:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
Are we? You no doubt have a source for that, but funnily enough I'm not
going to hold my breath.
Yes, do hold your breath...for 10 minutes or so.
Post by GB
By the way, "Made it up" doesn't count as a source.
By the way, all this is common knowledge, gleaned from centuries of
observing jew behaviour.
Well, I think it's pretty decent of you to admit you made it up.
Perhaps, there's just a little glimmer of hope for you?
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
Indeed. These days, it is thought of more charitably as allowing people
to recover from severe debt and lead a worthwhile life.
What about the creditors who get screwed by these fake jew
bankruptcies? How are they to recover?
What about the people screwed by you, with your fake software? John 8:7.
Grrikbastarde®™
2019-11-28 18:45:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:25:16 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
Are we? You no doubt have a source for that, but funnily enough I'm not
going to hold my breath.
Yes, do hold your breath...for 10 minutes or so.
Post by GB
By the way, "Made it up" doesn't count as a source.
By the way, all this is common knowledge, gleaned from centuries of
observing jew behaviour.
Well, I think it's pretty decent of you to admit you made it up.
There was no such admission. WE are the ones who demand sources...and
get them.
Post by GB
Perhaps, there's just a little glimmer of hope for you?
There is no hope at all for you in this country. And you know it.

------------------------------------------> 'Israeel'
Post by GB
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
Indeed. These days, it is thought of more charitably as allowing people
to recover from severe debt and lead a worthwhile life.
What about the creditors who get screwed by these fake jew
bankruptcies? How are they to recover?
What about the people screwed by you, with your fake software? John 8:7.
<sneer>

Why don't you cite extracts from your jew torah toilet roll instead of
the NT?

Your jew desperation is showing.
Peeler
2019-11-28 19:29:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:45:33 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grrikbastarde®™", farted again:


FLUSH psychopathic bullshit...

...and nothing's left! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
Peeler
2019-11-28 18:32:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 09:33:49 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
It's hardly difficult in my case, Sherlock.
I'm sure your contorted rodent-like jew face stands out like a sore
thumb, Shylock.
The ONLY thing "contorted" and "rodent-like" here is your "mind", filthy
dreckserb!
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Agreed. So is yours, Andrzej. I feel sorry for her. Same as I feel sorry
for you.
I don't feel sorry for her at all. Any more than I feel sorry for a
sleazy little raghead like you.
We know! You ARE a typical psychopath after all. You don't even understand
what "feeling sorry for someone" means!
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Are we? You no doubt have a source for that, but funnily enough I'm not
going to hold my breath.
Yes, do hold your breath...for 10 minutes or so.
He, like everyone else here, will just keep laughing at you for 10 minutes
or so, you ridiculous impotent bigmouth!
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
By the way, "Made it up" doesn't count as a source.
By the way, all this is common knowledge, gleaned from centuries of
observing jew behaviour.
Nope, it's the result of years of your clinical insanity, psychopathic
pedophilic dreckserb!
Post by Grrikbastard®™
Post by GB
Indeed. These days, it is thought of more charitably as allowing people
to recover from severe debt and lead a worthwhile life.
What about the creditors who get screwed by these fake jew
bankruptcies? How are they to recover?
NO creditor could EVER be as screwed as YOU are, pedophilic gay Razovic!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Pancho
2019-11-28 17:49:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.

A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.

Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.

I suppose there is an alternative explanation for your comment.
GB
2019-11-28 18:33:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I've never been convinced it's a good idea for creditors to make people
bankrupt, for the reasons you gave. HMRC do it quite a lot, and it may
be that they are simply in that frame of mind "that's what we always
do", or it may be calculated "pour encourager les autres".
Post by Pancho
I suppose there is an alternative explanation for your comment.
It makes sense if you believe that people are hiding assets, and you
think the TIB stands an earthly of discovering them.
Grrikbastarde®™
2019-11-28 18:48:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:33:04 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I've never been convinced it's a good idea for creditors to make people
bankrupt, for the reasons you gave. HMRC do it quite a lot, and it may
be that they are simply in that frame of mind "that's what we always
do", or it may be calculated "pour encourager les autres".
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases without
knowing what they mean.
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
I suppose there is an alternative explanation for your comment.
It makes sense if you believe that people are hiding assets, and you
think the TIB stands an earthly of discovering them.
Have they found yours yet?
Pancho
2019-11-28 18:58:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:33:04 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I've never been convinced it's a good idea for creditors to make people
bankrupt, for the reasons you gave. HMRC do it quite a lot, and it may
be that they are simply in that frame of mind "that's what we always
do", or it may be calculated "pour encourager les autres".
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases without
knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't fluent
in French.
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 20:35:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:58:43 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 18:33:04 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I've never been convinced it's a good idea for creditors to make people
bankrupt, for the reasons you gave. HMRC do it quite a lot, and it may
be that they are simply in that frame of mind "that's what we always
do", or it may be calculated "pour encourager les autres".
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases without
knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't fluent
in French.
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.

It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly. Encourager
in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral Byng, found
guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to give courage to
the others (being other admirals).
Peeler
2019-11-28 21:16:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:35:33 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.
It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly. Encourager
in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral Byng, found
guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to give courage to
the others (being other admirals).
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!! Bigmouthed perverted pedophilic psychopath
Razovic keeps trying to come across as an "intellectual" ...in typical
psychopathic manner! LOL
--
More of psychopath Razovic's typical psychopathic, pompous,
pseudo-intellectual bullshit posted in uk.legal:
"As the boundaries of science widen, previously unknown or
misunderstood 'knowledge' is improved. However, what you have in
front of you as you read this is some kind of keyboard. That is a
'fact' that cannot be disproven and/or replaced."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
LOL
Pancho
2019-11-28 21:35:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Pancho
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases without
knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't fluent
in French.
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.
It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly. Encourager
in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral Byng, found
guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to give courage to
the others (being other admirals).
Um! A good answer. I'm not entirely convinced, but I can't dismiss it
either. The nuance is beyond me. I will have to consult some native
French speakers.

So for now I will retire, wounded.
Joe
2019-11-28 21:58:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:35:52 +0000
Post by Pancho
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Pancho
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases
without knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't
fluent in French.
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.
It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly.
Encourager in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral
Byng, found guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to
give courage to the others (being other admirals).
Um! A good answer. I'm not entirely convinced, but I can't dismiss it
either. The nuance is beyond me. I will have to consult some native
French speakers.
So for now I will retire, wounded.
It doesn't matter what language it is. One might punish someone either
to discourage others from doing the same or to encourage them to do
better. So it works either way, but the famous quotation uses
'encourager'.
--
Joe
Grikbasturd®™
2019-11-28 22:10:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Joe
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:35:52 +0000
Post by Pancho
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Pancho
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases
without knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't
fluent in French.
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.
It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly.
Encourager in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral
Byng, found guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to
give courage to the others (being other admirals).
Um! A good answer. I'm not entirely convinced, but I can't dismiss it
either. The nuance is beyond me. I will have to consult some native
French speakers.
So for now I will retire, wounded.
It doesn't matter what language it is. One might punish someone either
to discourage others from doing the same or to encourage them to do
better. So it works either way, but the famous quotation uses
'encourager'.
Because in French, 'encourager' is not an exact antonym of
'décourager'.
Peeler
2019-11-28 22:32:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:10:20 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikbasturd®™
Because in French, 'encourager' is not an exact antonym of
'décourager'.
Looks like you finally got those seniles on uk.legal under your psychopathic
thumb, eh, retarded psychopath? They just don't get what's wrong with you,
retard! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
Peeler
2019-11-28 22:28:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:35:52 +0000, Pancho, another brain damaged,
Post by Pancho
Um! A good answer. I'm not entirely convinced, but I can't dismiss it
either. The nuance is beyond me. I will have to consult some native
French speakers.
So for now I will retire, wounded.
Do so! For good, troll-feeding senile idiot!
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-29 13:17:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 21:35:52 +0000, Pancho
Post by Pancho
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Pancho
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
Surely "pour décourager les autres". This is what happens when
pretentious subpeople like you use foreign language phrases without
knowing what they mean.
Best explain this to Volatire, although I'm surprised he wasn't fluent
in French.
Thank you for your contribution to the pretentiousness.
It's simple enough and Voltaire used the phrase correctly. Encourager
in French literally means to give courage to. Admiral Byng, found
guilty of neglect of duty, was executed in order to give courage to
the others (being other admirals).
Um! A good answer. I'm not entirely convinced, but I can't dismiss it
either. The nuance is beyond me. I will have to consult some native
French speakers.
So for now I will retire, wounded.
Perhaps that neo-Frog Abe Lard can add something?
Peeler
2019-11-29 14:04:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:17:04 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Pancho
So for now I will retire, wounded.
Perhaps that neo-Frog Abe Lard can add something?
Encourager means EXACTLY the same as "to encourage" in English, you brain
dead pseudo-intellectual psychopath! Period!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
Peeler
2019-11-28 19:31:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:48:19 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grrikbastarde®™
Have they found yours yet?
Have your neightbours found out about your clinical insanity yet, pedophilic
gay Razovic? I BET they have! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$***@usenetxs.com>
Incubus
2019-11-29 09:26:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I've never been convinced it's a good idea for creditors to make people
bankrupt, for the reasons you gave. HMRC do it quite a lot, and it may
be that they are simply in that frame of mind "that's what we always
do", or it may be calculated "pour encourager les autres".
That might be the only way to recover some of their loss. When HMRC do it, at
least it prevents further borrowing.
JNugent
2019-11-29 01:30:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's more
or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may be
openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own chance of
getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Post by Pancho
A bankruptcy petition has fees of £990 deposit and £280 court costs.
Strange indeed, that creditors would pay so much to avoid being repaid.
I suppose there is an alternative explanation for your comment.
Do you know anyone who has been made bankrupt? Are you aware of what
happens?
Pancho
2019-11-29 10:00:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's
more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may be
openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own chance of
getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
JNugent
2019-11-29 11:32:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's
more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may be
openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own chance of
getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
It doesn't.

Both elements are true. The circumstances of an individual case will
decide who instigates the process. But bankruptcy is still a formal way
of avoiding and minimising liability, which is of value to all debtors
who undergo it (even if it doesn't feel like that at the time) and to
many creditors.
Pancho
2019-11-29 12:18:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peeler
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's
more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may be
openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own chance of
getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
It doesn't.
Both elements are true. The circumstances of an individual case will
decide who instigates the process. But bankruptcy is still a formal way
of avoiding and minimising liability, which is of value to all debtors
who undergo it (even if it doesn't feel like that at the time) and to
many creditors.
Sigh!

OK, lets ignore that your statement significantly mischaracterises
bankruptcy and just concentrate on basic English.

1) Do you understand what the word *all* means in the contexts that you
used it?

2) How many counterexample cases would be needed to show that a
statement "claiming to be true for all cases" was in fact false?

3) Can you think of specific counterexamples where you have claimed
something is true for all cases?
JNugent
2019-11-29 12:26:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by Peeler
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's
more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may
be openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own chance
of getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
It doesn't.
Both elements are true. The circumstances of an individual case will
decide who instigates the process. But bankruptcy is still a formal
way of avoiding and minimising liability, which is of value to all
debtors who undergo it (even if it doesn't feel like that at the time)
and to many creditors.
Sigh!
OK, lets ignore that your statement significantly mischaracterises
bankruptcy and just concentrate on basic English.
It does not do that. Bankruptcy is a formal legal process for relieving
debtors of all or part of their unpayable debt. It has no other function
than that, though its process also allows the court to control the
bankrupt's assets and decide how they will be distributed (without
bankruptcy, it is the debtor who makes that decision, which may not be
in the interest of a particular creditor).
Post by Pancho
1) Do you understand what the word *all* means in the contexts that you
used it?
Don't...
Post by Pancho
2) How many counterexample cases would be needed to show that a
statement "claiming to be true for all cases" was in fact false?
Is there a case where bankruptcy does not absolve, whether partially or
fully, the debtor from debt?
Post by Pancho
3) Can you think of specific counterexamples where you have claimed
something is true for all cases?
Show that bankruptcy is not a method for absolving (or as the PC term
now seems to be: "forgiving") a debtor's... er... debt.

Maybe not all of it. Assets do fall to be allocated to creditors right
down to the home, cars, furniture and other possessions, but not within
the control of the debtor. All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid
paying creditors" (it's more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).

I suppose you could try and pick a hole in "more or less".
Pancho
2019-11-29 12:42:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by Peeler
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors" (it's
more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may
be openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own
chance of getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
It doesn't.
Both elements are true. The circumstances of an individual case will
decide who instigates the process. But bankruptcy is still a formal
way of avoiding and minimising liability, which is of value to all
debtors who undergo it (even if it doesn't feel like that at the
time) and to many creditors.
Sigh!
OK, lets ignore that your statement significantly mischaracterises
bankruptcy and just concentrate on basic English.
It does not do that. Bankruptcy is a formal legal process for relieving
debtors of all or part of their unpayable debt. It has no other function
than that, though its process also allows the court to control the
bankrupt's assets and decide how they will be distributed (without
bankruptcy, it is the debtor who makes that decision, which may not be
in the interest of a particular creditor).
Sorry, I just can't see that you are clever enough for a discussion at
this level. Let's just concentrate on the basic questions I've asked
you. If you can show a basic understanding of them we can revisit the issue.
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
1) Do you understand what the word *all* means in the contexts that
you used it?
Don't...
No, it doesn't mean Don't. Would you like another guess?
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
2) How many counterexample cases would be needed to show that a
statement "claiming to be true for all cases" was in fact false?
Is there a case where bankruptcy does not absolve, whether partially or
fully, the debtor from debt?
Try to read the question and answer what is asked.
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
3) Can you think of specific counterexamples where you have claimed
something is true for all cases?
Show that bankruptcy is not a method for absolving (or as the PC term
now seems to be: "forgiving") a debtor's... er... debt.
Maybe not all of it. Assets do fall to be allocated to creditors right
down to the home, cars, furniture and other possessions, but not within
the control of the debtor. All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid
paying creditors" (it's more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
I suppose you could try and pick a hole in "more or less".
OK, it appears to be a tough one so I'll give you a hint.

What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more money
than the total debt?
GB
2019-11-29 13:22:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more money
than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)

I'm off for a walk in the sun. Lovely weather today.
Pancho
2019-11-29 13:32:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun.  Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
GB
2019-11-29 15:25:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
You never get a good argument on Usenet, just a very, very long one.
OTOH, if you are confined to the house, what else are you going to do
with your time? Hope you get better soon.
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun.  Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
Incubus
2019-11-29 16:24:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
You never get a good argument on Usenet, just a very, very long one.
That's not true.
GB
2019-11-29 16:49:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
You never get a good argument on Usenet, just a very, very long one.
That's not true.

Dan S. MacAbre
2019-11-29 17:37:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
You never get a good argument on Usenet, just a very, very long one.
That's not true.
Yes it is.
pamela
2019-12-01 12:38:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun.  Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
You're wasting your time with Nugent. I saw how he evaded your query earlier
in this thread about hs use of the word "all", as in:

"which is of value to all debtors who undergo it"

When he makes a mistake he wheedles out of explaining himself clearly.
Keema's Nan
2019-12-01 17:09:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun. Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
I have an upset stomach, but not as bad as my grandkids who have been
projectile vomiting.

It doesn’t take long for these bugs to liven up come autumn/winter and
spread quickly around schools and nurseries.
You're wasting your time with Nugent. I saw how he evaded your query earlier
"which is of value to all debtors who undergo it"
When he makes a mistake he wheedles out of explaining himself clearly.
And then accuses everyone else of not explaining clearly.
JNugent
2019-12-01 17:52:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by pamela
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun.  Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
You're wasting your time with Nugent. I saw how he evaded your query earlier
"which is of value to all debtors who undergo it"
When he makes a mistake he wheedles out of explaining himself clearly.
You obviously labour under the mistaken apprehension that bankruptcy
exists as a punishment.
Keema's Nan
2019-12-01 18:45:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun. Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
You're wasting your time with Nugent. I saw how he evaded your query earlier
"which is of value to all debtors who undergo it"
When he makes a mistake he wheedles out of explaining himself clearly.
You obviously labour under the mistaken apprehension that bankruptcy
exists as a punishment.
In a financial sense, yes it does in some cases.

Anyone who tries to expand a business too fast, or into commercial areas they
know nothing about - is punished by going bust.
JNugent
2019-12-01 20:30:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by GB
Post by Pancho
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more
money than the total debt?
Are you two *really* arguing heatedly about what the word bankruptcy
means? :)
I'm trying to see if he can argue, sensibly.
Post by GB
I'm off for a walk in the sun. Lovely weather today.
I'm envious. I had a cold on Wednesday and still have an upset stomach
today, which makes going out imprudent.
You're wasting your time with Nugent. I saw how he evaded your query earlier
"which is of value to all debtors who undergo it"
When he makes a mistake he wheedles out of explaining himself clearly.
You obviously labour under the mistaken apprehension that bankruptcy
exists as a punishment.
In a financial sense, yes it does in some cases.
Anyone who tries to expand a business too fast, or into commercial areas they
know nothing about - is punished by going bust.
Going bust is something he accomplishes all on his own. The bankruptcy
process exists to ameliorate its effects, not to intensify them.
JNugent
2019-11-29 13:46:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by Peeler
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
Post by JNugent
All bankruptcies are "engineered to avoid paying creditors"
(it's more or less a text-book definition of bankruptcy).
How strange it is that creditors often apply to make people bankrupt.
When creditors do that, they do it so that the debtor's assets may
be openly controlled (by the court) and to maximise their own
chance of getting a partial repayment of what is owed.
Do you understand that this directly contradicts your previous statement?
It doesn't.
Both elements are true. The circumstances of an individual case will
decide who instigates the process. But bankruptcy is still a formal
way of avoiding and minimising liability, which is of value to all
debtors who undergo it (even if it doesn't feel like that at the
time) and to many creditors.
Sigh!
OK, lets ignore that your statement significantly mischaracterises
bankruptcy and just concentrate on basic English.
It does not do that. Bankruptcy is a formal legal process for
relieving debtors of all or part of their unpayable debt. It has no
other function than that, though its process also allows the court to
control the bankrupt's assets and decide how they will be distributed
(without bankruptcy, it is the debtor who makes that decision, which
may not be in the interest of a particular creditor).
Sorry, I just can't see that you are clever enough for a discussion at
this level. Let's just concentrate on the basic questions I've asked
you. If you can show a basic understanding of them we can revisit the issue.
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
1) Do you understand what the word *all* means in the contexts that
you used it?
Don't...
No, it doesn't mean Don't. Would you like another guess?
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
2) How many counterexample cases would be needed to show that a
statement "claiming to be true for all cases" was in fact false?
Is there a case where bankruptcy does not absolve, whether partially
or fully, the debtor from debt?
Try to read the question and answer what is asked.
Post by JNugent
Post by Pancho
3) Can you think of specific counterexamples where you have claimed
something is true for all cases?
Show that bankruptcy is not a method for absolving (or as the PC term
now seems to be: "forgiving") a debtor's... er... debt.
Maybe not all of it. Assets do fall to be allocated to creditors right
down to the home, cars, furniture and other possessions, but not
within the control of the debtor. All bankruptcies are "engineered to
avoid paying creditors" (it's more or less a text-book definition of
bankruptcy).
I suppose you could try and pick a hole in "more or less".
OK, it appears to be a tough one so I'll give you a hint.
What happens if, after the bankruptcy, the receiver recovers more money
than the total debt?
The bankrupt would be discharged, probably sooner than expected.

But people choose to be bankrupt - with all its implications, not all of
which are advantageous for a bankrupt - even when they're solvent?

That sounds like a system failure and not what the bankruptcy process is
aimed at.

But bankruptcy is still aimed at discharging unpaid / unpayable debt and
allowing a debtor to have some prospect of getting back to some
semblamce of normal life without a lifetime of onerous repayment. Hard
cases and "clever" examples wher the painting over the mantlepiece turns
out to be a Monet don't change that.
Peeler
2019-11-28 15:06:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:35:19 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by GB
How do you know what Paul thinks? Perhaps he just cares about
challenging racism? From his past posting, it's pretty clear that
challenging racism is indeed one of the things he cares about.
Identifying jews such as Katie Price and you is not 'racism'.
Identifying you as a rabid racist anti-Semitic swine is NOT discrimination,
dreckserb Razovic!
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Like you, he 'polices' these ngs and homes in every time the word 'Jew'
gets mentioned.
Do I police this NG? And you, what's your role?
WE arks the questions, jewboi.
YOU only get your bleeding psychopathic ass clobbered here by everyone ...to
everyone's constant enjoyment and entertainment, you poor psychopathic
asshole! <BG>
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by GB
To be precise, she has one Jewish grandparent and three non-Jewish ones,
but I wouldn't expect a wee bit of inaccuracy to get in the way of the
point you're trying to make. And, yes, she's been declared bankrupt. To
be frank, her life has been a slow motion train wreck, poor woman.
To be precise, your jew race's bizarre matrilineal rules make her 100%
jew because of her jew maternal grandmother. And her 'train wreck' of
a life is all of her own making.
She would only have been a quarter Jewish even by the obsessed nazis'
standards, you 100% percent psychopathic swine!
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by GB
Last year, there were 115,300 personal bankruptcies in England and
Wales. Not sure about the figures for 2019, but it's hard to see why a
particular individual's Jewishness is interesting. I can't believe that
she's the only Jew to have gone bankrupt this year. Perhaps you could
explain?
You will find that you jews are overrepresented in bankruptcies
engineered to avoid paying creditors.
ONLY in your retarded psychopathic head, pedophilic gay Razovic!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 14:42:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:19:58 +0000, jewboi GB (jb)
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
It probably doesn't in yours, but then again...
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
A 'jew ancestor', jewboi? According to your own race's bizarre
matrilineal rules, the fact that she had a jew maternal grandmother
makes her 100% jew.

The fact that she is a jew gives one a clue as to why she might go
bankrupt to avoid paying her creditors.
Peeler
2019-11-28 15:08:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:42:28 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by GB
It doesn't pass for logic in any sensible neck of the woods. OTOH, on
Usenet, inanity gets trotted out all the time.
As you seem to have missed the point, Paul was suggesting that few
people care very much about Katie Price at all, nor whether she has a
Jewish ancestor. You then suggested that he did. Why you think that
makes the slightest sense beats me, but no doubt you will attempt to
defend your ridiculous position stoutly.
A 'jew ancestor', jewboi? According to your own race's bizarre
matrilineal rules, the fact that she had a jew maternal grandmother
makes her 100% jew.
She would only have been a quarter Jewish even by the obsessed nazis'
standards, you 100% percent psychopathic swine!
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
The fact that she is a jew gives one a clue as to why she might go
bankrupt to avoid paying her creditors.
Ridiculous psychopathic nonsense! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 22:34:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
HAPPY GOOGLEFUCKING of the old bastard, TRAITOR and
COWARD David Irving, and his followers... LOLOK!

Some GREAT material hacked from David Irving's emails!!

Names, bank accounts, email addresses, and other numerous
info from his email files!

http://wlstorage.net/file/david-irving-emails-2009.txt

TSSK!!!!!!!
Vidcapper
2019-11-28 15:03:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
I just wish 'Grik' would stick with one nym, then I wouldn't have to
keep putting his new identity in the KF every hew days...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Col
2019-11-28 20:05:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
I just wish 'Grik' would stick with one nym, then I wouldn't have to
keep putting his new identity in the KF every hew days...
But you still reply to him?!?
--
Col
Vidcapper
2019-11-29 06:51:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by Vidcapper
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:58:15 +0000, Vidcapper
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
I just wish 'Grik' would stick with one nym, then I wouldn't have to
keep putting his new identity in the KF every hew days...
But you still reply to him?!?
Not if he's KF'd... :p
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Col
2019-11-29 18:05:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Col
Post by Vidcapper
Post by GB
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vidcapper
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:58:15 +0000, Vidcapper
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true, who gives a fuck?
You obviously did, otherwise why ask the question?
Does that pass for logic in your neck of the woods?
I just wish 'Grik' would stick with one nym, then I wouldn't have to
keep putting his new identity in the KF every hew days...
But you still reply to him?!?
Not if he's KF'd... :p
But if you know it's him, why reply if you would normally have him
killfilled?
Surely the whole point of the kf is so you don't even see their posts,
yet you reply to them anyway!
--
Col
Vidcapper
2019-11-30 06:53:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by Vidcapper
Not if he's KF'd... :p
But if you know it's him, why reply if you would normally have him
killfilled?
Surely the whole point of the kf is so you don't even see their posts,
yet you reply to them anyway!
His posts are marked automatically as read, but not deleted.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
Col
2019-11-30 07:42:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Col
Post by Vidcapper
Not if he's KF'd... :p
But if you know it's him, why reply if you would normally have him
killfilled?
Surely the whole point of the kf is so you don't even see their posts,
yet you reply to them anyway!
His posts are marked automatically as read, but not deleted.
Ah, OK.
To me that's not really a killfile but each to their own.
--
Col
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 14:25:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
Peeler
2019-11-28 15:10:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:25:41 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
ONLY a quarter Jewish by your OWN obsessed nazoid standards, dreckserb
Razovic!
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
LOL Poor psychopathic retard!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
Col
2019-11-28 20:07:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
That is not a skill that I have ever considered to be useful.
--
Col
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 20:34:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
That is not a skill that I have ever considered to be useful.
You'll find it *very* useful if you ever start a business or otherwise
engage in commercial activities.

God gave these people a distinctive appearance as a warning to the
unwary, much like he gave certain venomous reptiles bright colouring.
Peeler
2019-11-28 21:19:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:34:32 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Col
That is not a skill that I have ever considered to be useful.
You'll find it *very* useful if you ever start a business or otherwise
engage in commercial activities.
He's find that you ARE clinically insane, psychopathic and perverted,
pedophilic gay Razovic!
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
God gave these people a distinctive appearance as a warning to the
unwary, much like he gave certain venomous reptiles bright colouring.
LOL See above, poor idiot!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
Col
2019-11-29 05:42:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Col
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
That is not a skill that I have ever considered to be useful.
You'll find it *very* useful if you ever start a business or otherwise
engage in commercial activities.
God gave these people a distinctive appearance as a warning to the
unwary, much like he gave certain venomous reptiles bright colouring.
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!

--
Col
Peeler
2019-11-29 08:46:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:42:17 +0000, Col, another mentally deficient,
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
I can spot a troll-feeding senile idiot like you by just one quick glance at
one of your posts, Colon!
Grikbasturd®™
2019-11-29 20:14:18 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Col
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
Her biography does.
OK then, assuming for the sake of argument it's true,
It is true: 100% jew by their own bizarre rules.
Post by Vidcapper
who gives a fuck?
I give a fuck, for the benefit of those gullible Gentiles who are
unable to identify a jew by sight.
That is not a skill that I have ever considered to be useful.
You'll find it *very* useful if you ever start a business or otherwise
engage in commercial activities.
God gave these people a distinctive appearance as a warning to the
unwary, much like he gave certain venomous reptiles bright colouring.
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
Peeler
2019-11-29 20:41:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:14:18 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikbasturd®™
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
You mean there are more sick asshole like you out there? And you are trying
to find some of them on uk.legal? Guess what will come of it, my punching
bag! Just guess! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic answering a question whether there
is any "meaningful" debate to lower the age of consent:
"If there isn't, there should be."
MID: <ZAMUE.174724$***@usenetxs.com>
Col
2019-11-30 04:47:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
No, it's classic comedy.

Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
--
Col
Peeler
2019-11-30 08:53:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 04:47:29 +0000, Col, another mentally deficient,
Post by Col
No, it's classic comedy.
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
You idiot just don't get it! <tsk>
Keema's Nan
2019-11-30 11:06:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Peeler
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 04:47:29 +0000, Col, another mentally deficient,
Post by Col
No, it's classic comedy.
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
You idiot just don't get it! <tsk>
Which “Peeler” are you?

The obvious nutjob; or the clinically insane psychopath?
Peeler
2019-11-30 13:15:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 11:06:49 +0000, Keema's Nan, an especially retarded,
Post by Keema's Nan
Post by Peeler
You idiot just don't get it! <tsk>
Which “Peeler” are you?
The obvious nutjob; or the clinically insane psychopath?
I'm pleased to see that you felt personally addressed when I mentioned the
word "idiot", you obvious nutjob!
G***@skata.co.uk
2019-11-30 15:38:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by Grikbasturd®™
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
No, it's classic comedy.
Sorry, it's not.
Post by Col
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
"What you clearly already are"???

The very suggestion that jews are somehow different (from humans)
could be misconstrued as vaguely 'anti-semitic'®™.
Peeler
2019-11-30 16:38:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 07:38:21 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by G***@skata.co.uk
Post by Col
No, it's classic comedy.
Sorry, it's not.
Post by Col
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
"What you clearly already are"???
The very suggestion that jews are somehow different (from humans)
could be misconstrued as vaguely 'anti-semitic'®™.
Strange, you are quite open about being a sick asshole, pedo and psychopath,
yet this idiot still doesn't get it! Aren't you surprised too, dreckserb
Razovic? LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: <Y8LUE.513827$***@usenetxs.com>
Col
2019-12-01 05:51:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by G***@skata.co.uk
Post by Col
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
No, it's classic comedy.
Sorry, it's not.
Post by Col
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
"What you clearly already are"???
The very suggestion that jews are somehow different (from humans)
could be misconstrued as vaguely 'anti-semitic'®™.
In order for the joke to work you need to have someone whose
appearance/behaviour is such that it instantly says - Jewish!
Stereotypical perhaps but it wouldn't work otherwise. And it's not just
about Jews anyway, see his friend at the end who wants to insure against
becoming a Catholic but looks like the Pope's right hand man!
--
Col
Peeler
2019-12-01 08:47:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 05:51:39 +0000, Col, another mentally deficient,
Post by Col
Post by G***@skata.co.uk
The very suggestion that jews are somehow different (from humans)
could be misconstrued as vaguely 'anti-semitic'®™.
In order for the joke to work you need to have someone whose
appearance/behaviour is such that it instantly says - Jewish!
Stereotypical perhaps but it wouldn't work otherwise. And it's not just
about Jews anyway, see his friend at the end who wants to insure against
becoming a Catholic but looks like the Pope's right hand man!
Just what the fuck is wrong with you? Oh, yeah, I know, you are SENILE! <BG>
Grrikbassturdah®™
2019-12-02 12:55:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
Post by G***@skata.co.uk
Post by Col
Post by Grikbasturd®™
Post by Col
Well this insurance guy could certainly spot one!
http://youtu.be/vSKtEwxpdd4
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ stereotypimg.
No, it's classic comedy.
Sorry, it's not.
Post by Col
Do you really not get the joke, it's not anti-semitic, it's the sheer
absurdity of attempting to insure yourself against becoming what you
clearly already are!
"What you clearly already are"???
The very suggestion that jews are somehow different (from humans)
could be misconstrued as vaguely 'anti-semitic'®™.
In order for the joke to work you need to have someone whose
appearance/behaviour is such that it instantly says - Jewish!
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ tropes. Der Stürmer was full of such
caricatures:
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sturmer.htm

This erstwhile publication even predicted the jew sexual misconduct of
the # me joo movement!
Post by Col
Stereotypical perhaps but it wouldn't work otherwise.
There's no doubt about it...'anti-semitism'®™ works every time.
Has the 'chief rabbi' seen this?
Post by Col
And it's not just
about Jews anyway, see his friend at the end who wants to insure against
becoming a Catholic but looks like the Pope's right hand man!
A feeble attempt to diversify the bigotry.
Peeler
2019-12-02 13:19:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 02 Dec 2019 04:55:54 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grrikbassturdah®™", farted
Post by Grrikbassturdah®™
Post by Col
In order for the joke to work you need to have someone whose
appearance/behaviour is such that it instantly says - Jewish!
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ tropes. Der Stürmer was full of such
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sturmer.htm
Yeah, dreckserb Razovic, keep teaching him what you are all about. He still
won't get it! LOL
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Why do we still have outdated laws prohibiting paedophilia? Do you
seriously think that a 12-year old who spends 15 hours a day on Facebook
doesn't know what's going on?"
MID: <FnMUE.676068$***@usenetxs.com>
Col
2019-12-03 05:43:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Col
In order for the joke to work you need to have someone whose
appearance/behaviour is such that it instantly says - Jewish!
Classic 'anti-semitic'®™ tropes. Der Stürmer was full of such
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sturmer.htm
This erstwhile publication even predicted the jew sexual misconduct of
the # me joo movement!
Comparing The Two Ronnies to Nazi propaganda??
Now you're just being ridiculous.
Post by Col
Stereotypical perhaps but it wouldn't work otherwise.
There's no doubt about it...'anti-semitism'®™ works every time.
Has the 'chief rabbi' seen this?
Post by Col
And it's not just
about Jews anyway, see his friend at the end who wants to insure against
becoming a Catholic but looks like the Pope's right hand man!
A feeble attempt to diversify the bigotry.
So how would you construct the sketch then, of wanting to insure
yourself against something happening to you that has obviously already
occurred?
--
Col
NEMO
2019-11-28 22:33:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In article <***@4ax.com>,
sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron ("Grikkbassturde") wrote:

[flush]

How much money did you make peddling pirated software in
London, old nazoid pedo?

<quote>

Original Microsoft CD in jewel case with CD key sticker on the back.
Full version.
GBP 30=00 incl recorded delivery postage.
(sorry, spamtrap in original message)
e-mail to: ***@ukgateway.net

</quote>
Dan S. MacAbre
2019-11-28 13:11:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
I honestly thought the OP was trying to sound like Yoda :-)
Ian Jackson
2019-11-28 13:35:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
In message <qroh2d$17r$***@dont-email.me>, Dan S. MacAbre <***@way.com>
writes
Post by Dan S. MacAbre
On 26/11/2019 19:08, Grikkbassturd0 >>> https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
I honestly thought the OP was trying to sound like Yoda :-)
Yoda WAS Jewish!

--
Grikkbassturde®™
2019-11-28 14:31:22 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dan S. MacAbre
Post by Vidcapper
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
What makes you think she is Jewish??
I honestly thought the OP was trying to sound like Yoda :-)
Like Yoda, you want I should sound?
Peeler
2019-11-28 15:11:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:31:22 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grikkbassturde®™", farted
Post by Grikkbassturde®™
Post by Dan S. MacAbre
I honestly thought the OP was trying to sound like Yoda :-)
Like Yoda, you want I should sound?
Instead, like a retard, you ALWAYS sound, Retardovic!
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"There will always be progressives such as Harriet Harperson who want to
take that extra step forward. Paedophiles are still a long way from
being widely accepted."
MID: <rlMUE.676067$***@usenetxs.com>
Michael Ejercito
2019-11-27 18:28:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Mangina, Katie Price being Jewish would be beside the point.


Michael
shick old yidoid pedo Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jacobsohn')
2019-11-30 15:45:59 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:07:24 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
"shick old yidoid pedo Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jacobsohn')" wrote in
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:28:42 -0800, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Grikkbassturd®™
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-50561711
Botoxed negroid lips, she can afford?
Mangina, Katie Price being Jewish would be beside the point.
Needledick, Katie Price being a hideous circumcised jew cunt would be
PRECISELY the point.
Nithing, no matter how many times that you call her a cunt, you have NO
chance with her!
Needledick, no matter how many times you try to defend her, you got,
NO chance of zsuckling her fat jew rectum.
Michael
Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
--
The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$***@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$***@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$***@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$***@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$***@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$***@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."
Peeler
2019-11-30 16:42:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 30 Nov 2019 07:45:59 -0800, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "shick old yidoid pedo Baruch
Post by shick old yidoid pedo Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jacobsohn')
Nithing, no matter how many times that you call her a cunt, you have NO
chance with her!
Needledick, no matter how many times you try to defend her, you got,
NO chance of zsuckling her fat jew rectum.
Again with the rectums, pedophilic gay Razovic? <G>
Post by shick old yidoid pedo Baruch 'Barry' Shein (aka 'Ron Jacobsohn')
Michael
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"A lowering of the age of consent to reflect the rate at which today's
youngsters 'mature'."
MID: <gKNUE.1374684$***@usenetxs.com>
Loading...