Discussion:
will the parliamentry dwarf now rule out a vote on the eussr agreement because
(too old to reply)
abelard
2019-10-21 10:08:29 UTC
Permalink
it might go through?

it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats

we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
--
www.abelard.org
Incubus
2019-10-21 10:24:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.

Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.
abelard
2019-10-21 10:28:22 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:29 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.
the prime objective must be to get them to expose themselves,
and to publicise the fact that they are trying to bypass
democracy...

the more they expose themselves the better
--
www.abelard.org
Incubus
2019-10-21 10:36:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:29 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.
the prime objective must be to get them to expose themselves,
and to publicise the fact that they are trying to bypass
democracy...
the more they expose themselves the better
Perhaps, but what's to be done about it if they just ignore our votes? This
really has progressed into tyranny.
abelard
2019-10-21 10:44:23 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:36:56 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:29 -0000 (UTC), Incubus
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.
the prime objective must be to get them to expose themselves,
and to publicise the fact that they are trying to bypass
democracy...
the more they expose themselves the better
Perhaps, but what's to be done about it if they just ignore our votes? This
really has progressed into tyranny.
the conditions for tyranny were established by the likes of h*****
and bliar...this is just the playing out of their actions

it's at the core of why i exiled myself
--
www.abelard.org
Ophelia
2019-10-21 14:44:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.

Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.

===

Amen to that!!! And it can't come soon enough!
Keema's Nan
2019-10-21 15:14:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
Let's just fetch the rope and be done with. We can permanently remove the
tyrant and wipe the smug grin off his face in one fell swoop.
===
Amen to that!!! And it can't come soon enough!
+1
James Hammerton
2019-10-21 20:13:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
also because the amendment specifies that the legislation must be voted on:

https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784


Regards,

James
Ian Jackson
2019-10-21 21:02:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
In his 6pm LBC spot this evening, even Nigel Farage conceded that The
Speaker was justified in not allowing a repeat of Saturday's debate.
Nevertheless, this did not prevent him from voicing his usual scathing
criticisms of Berco for his generally pro-Remain bias.
--
Ian
MM
2019-10-22 14:20:37 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:02:49 +0100, Ian Jackson
Post by Ian Jackson
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
In his 6pm LBC spot this evening, even Nigel Farage conceded that The
Speaker was justified in not allowing a repeat of Saturday's debate.
Nevertheless, this did not prevent him from voicing his usual scathing
criticisms of Berco for his generally pro-Remain bias.
Be that as it may WRT Farage, the fact is that it was *Incubus* in
this thread who made a false claim when he stated: "...even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday."

' Bout time he came back and apologised for attempting to mislead us.

MM
Incubus
2019-10-21 21:45:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
Farmer Giles
2019-10-22 07:18:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.

A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Incubus
2019-10-22 08:53:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Farmer Giles
2019-10-22 10:12:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!
Ophelia
2019-10-22 10:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!

==

What others??
Incubus
2019-10-22 10:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!
==
What others??
Agenda 21.
Ophelia
2019-10-22 15:53:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!
==
What others??
Agenda 21.

====

Thank you:) Something else to research:)
Farmer Giles
2019-10-22 10:48:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!
==
  What others??
Let's put it like this: similar plans were being hatched well before
Coudenhove-Kalergi was even born.
Ophelia
2019-10-22 15:55:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Incubus
Post by James Hammerton
Post by Incubus
Post by abelard
it might go through?
it's all boris's fault say the anti-democrats
we must vote against boris to make sure it's all his fault
The amendment was to withhold approval but the poison dwarf seems to think
there is a problem voting twice on the same piece of legislature even though
Parliament didn't actually vote on it on Saturday.
According to this twitter thread, the amended motion went through "on
the nod" because the government did not push for a division, ergo the
attempt to vote on the motion fails for it being the same motion and
https://mobile.twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1185991375306870784
It seems to me, as another contributor to that thread wrote, that the
amendment has changed the motion substantively enough that it would not
be the same motion going before Parliament.
All you need to work out to understand the latest HoC shenanigans is
what Bercow and Letwin have in common.
A united Europe and the bastardisation of its people is part of a
long-term plan - anything that gets in the way of that process will be
obstructed in all possible ways.
Indeed, it is all going according to the Kalergi Plan.
Yep, that's the one - amongst others!
==
What others??
Let's put it like this: similar plans were being hatched well before
Coudenhove-Kalergi was even born.

===

Ahh thanks. I am still learning and I am very grateful for any help or
instruction:)

Loading...