Discussion:
A better way to vote
(too old to reply)
Vladimir Putin
2024-03-28 14:01:57 UTC
Permalink
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority requirement. No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded complicated approaches. If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better time! ONE WINNER! And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the rightfull winner isn't in power.
Farmer Giles
2024-03-28 15:09:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement.  No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches.  If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time!  ONE WINNER!  And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Increasingly it's not the votes that count, but who counts the votes.
JNugent
2024-03-28 17:46:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no
majority requirement.  No country seems to do this, they all have
longwinded complicated approaches.  If Linford Christie wins a race,
you don't have a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them
they got a better time!  ONE WINNER!  And yes this is based on the
Dutch farce where the rightfull winner isn't in power.
Increasingly it's not the votes that count, but who counts the votes.
...and how creative they can be with the count.
Incubus
2024-03-28 17:54:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by JNugent
Post by Farmer Giles
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no
majority requirement.  No country seems to do this, they all have
longwinded complicated approaches.  If Linford Christie wins a race,
you don't have a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them
they got a better time!  ONE WINNER!  And yes this is based on the
Dutch farce where the rightfull winner isn't in power.
Increasingly it's not the votes that count, but who counts the votes.
...and how creative they can be with the count.
If you're in Tower Hamlets or Bradford, vote early and often. It's
amazing how many people can fit into a one-bedroom flat. Talk about a
housing crisis.
Pancho
2024-03-28 18:13:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement.  No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches.  If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time!  ONE WINNER!  And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.

The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.

Congratulations, by the way.
Vladimir Putin
2024-03-28 22:43:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement. No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches. If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time! ONE WINNER! And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.
The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.
Congratulations, by the way.
On what, my leveling of Nazi ukraine is not yet complete.
Pancho
2024-03-29 11:51:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Vladimir Putin
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement.  No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches.  If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time!  ONE WINNER!  And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.
The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.
Congratulations, by the way.
Winning the 2024 election, of course, 88%, very impressive. Of course,
Dolph got 92.1% in Nov 1933.
Post by Vladimir Putin
On what, my leveling of Nazi ukraine is not yet complete.
Yeah, perhaps you have your eye on Odessa?
Vladimir Putin
2024-03-29 12:39:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement. No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches. If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time! ONE WINNER! And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.
The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.
Congratulations, by the way.
Winning the 2024 election, of course, 88%, very impressive. Of course,
Dolph got 92.1% in Nov 1933.
The competition wasn't exactly fierce. And the Russian population are behind my rightfull war.
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
On what, my leveling of Nazi ukraine is not yet complete.
Yeah, perhaps you have your eye on Odessa?
You lot started it. Don't mistreat Russians in the East of Ukraine and think you can get away with it.
Vladimir Putin
2024-03-29 12:40:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement. No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches. If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time! ONE WINNER! And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.
The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.
Congratulations, by the way.
Winning the 2024 election, of course, 88%, very impressive. Of course,
Dolph got 92.1% in Nov 1933.
The competition wasn't exactly fierce. And the Russian population are behind my rightfull war.
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
On what, my leveling of Nazi ukraine is not yet complete.
Yeah, perhaps you have your eye on Odessa?
You lot started it. Don't mistreat Russians in the East of Ukraine and think you can get away with it.
Vladimir Putin
2024-03-29 12:40:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
1 vote per person, party with the most votes wins, no seats, no majority
requirement. No country seems to do this, they all have longwinded
complicated approaches. If Linford Christie wins a race, you don't have
a coalition between 2nd and 3rd saying between them they got a better
time! ONE WINNER! And yes this is based on the Dutch farce where the
rightfull winner isn't in power.
Good old 'Dolph got in with only 33%.
The peroxide blonde only managed 23%.
Congratulations, by the way.
Winning the 2024 election, of course, 88%, very impressive. Of course,
Dolph got 92.1% in Nov 1933.
The competition wasn't exactly fierce. And the Russian population are behind my rightfull war.
Post by Pancho
Post by Vladimir Putin
On what, my leveling of Nazi ukraine is not yet complete.
Yeah, perhaps you have your eye on Odessa?
You lot started it. Don't mistreat Russians in the East of Ukraine and think you can get away with it.
Loading...